Session 12: Overview of EBP outline (and semi-structured interviews/litmus) including: the policy brief outline, e.g., identification of how the problem related to risk factors/disease, to a program or service, and/or to the current health system viable policy or programmatic options to address the problem and potential barriers that could influence implementation policy options. ‘top-down’ and ‘Bottom-up’) identifying and addressing barriers to implementing policies health system, and social and political constraints and tips on developing the implementation considerations. Session 11 included: approaches to policy implementation (i.e. Session 11: Identifying Key Implementation Considerations Framing presented by EVIPNet-K2P Center. The refresher session finished with ‘Case examples’. Webinar 6 provided a ‘ Refresher: from problem statement to policy options‘ on the content of Evidence-to-Policy Briefs (EBP) including the problem statement, options and elements, and implementation considerations framing the problem, clarifying its underlying causes, the appropriate types of evidence to use in framing problems, and framing, developing, and expanding on the options/ elements to address the problem. Stakeholder selection, i.e., degree of involvement in/knowledge about the issue and relevant solutions ability to constructively engage in discussions ability to take forward recommended actions within respective constituencies and the importance of the dialogue facilitator’s role.ĭialogue summary, i.e., tools to outline the results of the discussions during the policy dialogue and post-dialogue summaries.įeedback from country teams on progress to date (10 minutes per team) Preparation for policy dialogues, i.e., informed by pre-circulated evidence on the policy issue. Webinar Session 13: Organizing a policy dialogue presented by EVIPNet-K2P Center, focusing on how policy dialogues influence the use of evidence in health policy and decision-making including:Ĭonsiderations for conducting policy dialogues, i.e., does the dialogue address a high priority issue? Does it provide opportunities to discuss/address the issue, and considerations for implementation? Is there fair representation among those involved in/affected by future decisions related to the issue? Are follow-up activities undertaken to support action? Uganda, Malawi, Nepal briefly shared progress and EVIPNet/K2P team commented on the progress. Select key relevant stakeholders for semi-structured interviews/litmus testingįeedback from country teams on preparatory work/progress to date:.Identify implementation considerations for policy options.Small clinics aren’t worse but their success rate is more likely to be affected by these kinds of changes. That’s not because their data is more accurate but because their rate is less likely to be affected by small changes in the number of births in one year. ![]() ![]() Large clinics normally have a narrower reliability range. The reliability range shows how confident we are that a clinic will repeat its success rate in the future – the narrower the range, the more confident we can be. Try not to read anything into differences of few percentage points, as these are often down to chance rather than being a reflection of a clinic’s abilities. It may be tempting to obsess over success rates, but the most important thing to focus on is whether the clinic’s results are consistent with the national average. ![]() The professional bodies have best practice guidelines to assist clinics in determining when a single embryo should be transferred and the factors which can make double embryo transfer appropriate. ![]() That’s why we’ve set a target for all clinics to have a multiple birth rate of 10% or lower – see how they’re performing below. For some people, having twins may seem like a wonderful thing, but multiple pregnancies are less safe for both mother and babies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |